7 Reasons Washington’s Grand Counter-Terrorism Myths Persist In The Face of Evidence

1. The bewildered herd is lost in the maze of small details, while the doctors of reality construct mental traps and dead-ends in order to contain the conversation of contested political events and issues within the parameters of the U.S.-Israeli counter-terrorism paradigm.

myth 7 Reasons Washington’s Grand Counter-Terrorism Myths Persist In The Face of Evidence

The political conversation about the Bin Laden raid, a key event in the counter-terrorism paradigm, is based on a government-created conspiracy theory. People argue about the nitty-gritty details of the raid as if it actually happened in the real world. Since May 1, 2011, numerous versions of the infamous raid has come out, each one contradicting the other.

Instead of asking if the raid is real, political commentators and columnists are debating about which version of the raid is true. In effect, they are conspiracy theorists, something that they accuse 9/11 truth-tellers of because they can’t handle the truth.

As an example, read this article from November 7, 2011, published in The Atlantic, called, “The Six Biggest Discrepancies in Accounts of the Bin Laden Raid.

|