In February of this year, a Georgetown law student testified before Rep. Nancy Pelosi and the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee. Sandra Fluke spoke about the contraception mandate and women’s health. She pleaded for the new mandate because of student’s suffering from lack of contraceptive coverage and how they suffer financially, medically and emotionally.
Following her testimony, radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh referred to Fluke as a slut. Although he later apologized, in fact he was right. Anyone engaging in sexual relations outside of marriage is a fornicator and a slut. However, the public main stream media virtually hung Limbaugh on a cross to crucify him for speaking the truth, while at the same time the same media vociferously defended Fluke and her defense of sexual promiscuity and fornication. It didn’t take long before the media made Fluke a poster girl for the contraception mandate.
Fluke was brave enough to testify before a House committee where all she had to do was read a written statement. There wasn’t anyone there to really challenge her or her morals. Her next public appearance is scheduled for this week at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina.
However, before taking the podium at the DNC, Fluke and Chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz were seen strolling through the Republican National Convention last Thursday, prior to Mitt Romney’s acceptance speech. The two enemies of the GOP were reported to flit from media station to media station before making their escape.
Breitbart.com editor, Dana Loesch looked for Fluke at the RNC, but to no avail. She has been tweeting at Fluke, trying to challenge her to a public debate over women’s health and contraception, but so far the debate challenge has gone unanswered. Loesch is not surprised telling the Daily Caller:
“If Sandra Fluke is going to come here and talk about women’s issues, then why not talk to actual conservative women about women’s issues? I mean, that’s the whole point. You can’t just come here and hold a press conference and not take any questions. You can’t just go on MSNBC and say whatever you want. Is she an advocate or propagandist? Which one is she? If she’s an advocate, she’s completely willing to have a discussion on the issues. Democrats don’t speak for women. They don’t speak for me. I would like to hear why she thinks she speaks for all women because she obviously does not.