The New Boston Tea Party
If you want to know how to break into a bank, ask a successful bank robber. And so if you want to know how to cast an illegal vote ask a Democrat, for they surely know how its done. Very rarely have Republicans been caught in the act, but Democrats, they know every trick in the book; matter of fact they probably have a road manual on how it is done. As this November election looms the Democrats are looking to salvage some victories. Current polls predict a Republican Senate, this in itself is sending shivers down the backs of the liberal progressive ballot stuffers.
Many Pols of the Democrat persuasion are still behaving like we are back to the days of Jim Crow. The Voting Right Act offers protection to all of those who are eligible to vote, but many Progressives believe that state laws requesting photo ID’s is too harsh. Therefore, their Ton Ton Macoutes have taken upon themselves focus on winning many of the Secretary of State races up for grabs. Once seated they can easily change voting requirements.
Voter fraud is easily committed in many states, (click) New York for example is most lax, even the dead have come out of their grave to vote; talk about miracles. From the above article (click New York): The Board of Elections, which has a $750 million annual budget and a workforce of 350 people, reacted in classic bureaucratic fashion, which prompted one city paper to deride it as “a 21st-century survivor of Boss Tweed–style politics.” The Board approved a resolution referring the DOI’s investigators for prosecution. It also asked the state’s attorney general to determine whether DOI had violated the civil rights of voters who had moved or are felons, and it sent a letter of complaint to Mayor Bill de Blasio.
Normally, I wouldn’t think de Blasio would give the BOE the time of day, but New York’s new mayor has long been a close ally of former leaders of ACORN, the now-disgraced “community organizing” group that saw its employees convicted of voter-registration fraud all over the country during and after the 2008 election.
What Mayor de Blasio was so upset about was that the Department of Investigation (DOI) was bringing voter fraud to the fore. It didn’t concern Mayor deBlasio how easy it was to cast an illegal vote, but how easy it was for the DOI to impersonate a voter. He was upset that the scheme was uncovered. Law abiding citizens now know the Democrat game plan chapter and verse.
In a move that drew the ire of Texas officials, Attorney General Eric Holder’s Justice Department asked a San Antonio-based federal court to force Texas to get permission from the federal government before it can make any additional changes to its voting and election laws.
The challenge to Texas’ authority comes after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a portion of the Voting Rights Act. The high court’s 5-4 decision invalidated a rule that singled out certain states, like Texas and North Carolina, and forced them to get Justice Department approval before changing their election rules.
You see, Holder doesn’t like the Supreme Court decision as noted above one bit. He is attempting to circumvent their most recent Voting Rights Act decision which invalidated a rule agreed upon 50 years ago. There isn’t anybody in their right mind today who does not believe that states try their damndest to prevent people from voting. But Holder is the AG and he sees things differently. His racist profiling of Texas manifests the ill will of our attorney general.
“Once again, the Obama Administration is demonstrating utter contempt for our country’s system of checks and balances, not to mention the U.S. Constitution. This end-run around the Supreme Court undermines the will of the people of Texas, and casts unfair aspersions on our state’s common-sense efforts to preserve the integrity of our elections process,” Gov. Rick Perry said in a statement.
Today, in a precedent setting decision, the Supreme Court struck down major parts of the Voting Rights Act. This did not sit well with Attorney Holder who warned states not to go too far. We call this a veiled threat. Venom was coming out of the attorney general’s mouth when the decision was rendered. He immediately confronted the states. This pits conservatives states against the socialist thug government he represents. This decision is a road block to the socialist machine and makes it harder for them to steal an election.
The court potentially opened the door for certain states to proceed with voter ID laws and other efforts that to date had been held up because of the Voting Rights Act. Prominent among those are voter identification laws in Alabama and Mississippi.
Obama and Holder weren’t afraid of Blacks being prevented from casting their ballot, those days are long gone. Their primary concern is that illegal aliens who have voted in the past, will not be able to cast their ballot in the future.
Attorney General Holder is anti-Constitution. In the past he has not agreed with the Supreme Court regarding their recent decision that the Constitution gives citizens the right to own a gun under the 2nd Amendment.
Holder’s track record offers enough proof that he enforces laws only to his liking. This is like having no laws at all. The oath he took to defend the Constitution against all enemies domestic and foreign was nothing but an empty oath. Holder is nothing but a bold face liar and deserves to be fired and brought to justice.
Reported by Michelle Malkin, the New Black Panthers head back to the polling place.
Patriots, we have a rogue government, filled with Socialists who are attempting to take away our natural rights given to us by God, in addition to trashing our Freedoms granted to us by the Constitution.
They want war, we will give them war.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/25/supreme-court-strikes-down-key-part-voting-rights-act/#ixzz2XH6vXGfZ
Rand Paul weighs in on voter suppression or the lack there of.
Governor Pat McCrory signed into law North Carolina’s new voting right regulations. But it did not take long before the ACLU and NCAA jumped in, threatening to sue. This is to be expected, by doing so one can reasonably assume that these organizations condone felonious behavior. Thirty four states require some form of photo I.D. It is hard to believe, but even the liberal bastion of Connecticut requires a photo I.D. The reasoning for the law is simple, to engage in other forms of activities require a photo I.D., such as air travel. Keep in mind that our vote, your vote, is the primary weapon we have against tyranny.
However, Democrats and libertarians no less, believe it to be a ploy to suppress voter turnout of blacks, elderly and the poor. Of course we can see through their true intent which is to steal an election by allowing illegals to vote.
The passage of the law has Eric Holder up in arms especially in light of the recent Supreme Court Decision which wiped out the constraints of the Voting Rights Act that required prior approval of the justice department before any changes were to be made. For Holder or for that matter any of his patrons to offer up evidence of states restricting citizens right to cast a vote is virtually impossible. So then, what is the reason for their belligerence? And why would not an elderly person have a photo I.D.? We can’t think of any, maybe Holder can.
If they want a fight and we will gladly accommodate them.
Click here for the signing in ceremony.