Many presidential candidates have come and gone over the past year (yes, it’s been more than a year since the first candidate started campaigning), but when it comes to gun rights, Hillary is by far the most terrifying person to compete for the White House. Even more so than socialist Bernie Sanders if you can believe that. If you’re wondering what a Clinton administration would do to gun rights, then take a look at this clip and see if you notice anything peculiar.
While that woman likened gun manufacturers to terrorist enablers, Hillary just sits there and nods in agreement.
Hillary has repeatedly expressed support for stripping away gun manufacturer’s legal protection from lawsuits, so they can be sued whenever a gun is used in a crime. This week she had the gall to compare gun companies to toy companies when she tweeted “If toy companies are held accountable for endangering our kids, gun makers should be too. Let’s end their immunity.”
Obviously there is no comparison to be made here. Toy companies sell playthings to kids who aren’t mature enough to know what a choking hazard is. Gun companies sell weapons to adults who know exactly what they’re doing, for better or for worse. They can’t be held liable for the decisions of fully functional adults.
Meanwhile Bernie Sanders, the most left leaning candidate America has seen in decades, has admitted that gun manufacturers shouldn’t be suedby the victims of mass shooters. That should tell you all need to know about how bad a Hillary presidency would be for gun rights.
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple