David Rockefeller’s Chilling Speech at a Bilderberg Meeting #NWO

March 25, 2022 Posted By History

Kalee Brown, Collective Evolution

With the passing of David Rockefeller, I started to reflect on his views of the world. Time and time again he pushed for a New World Order and a one world government, which would allow the elite and world bankers to hold complete control over the global population. This got me thinking: Do people even understand the gravity of the situation at hand, or what a one world government would mean?

What the New World Order Would Look Like

Throughout history, numerous politicians and members of the elite have spoken out about their support for a one world government or a New World Order, and the shadow government that’s pushing for it, but what do all of these terms mean?

The New World Order is the supposed goal of a handful of global elitists who are pushing for a one world government and a heightened national security state. This group often referred to as the cabal, has been using foreign threats to heighten security, strip us of our rights, and invade other countries. The entire world is practically covered with U.S. military bases, with the exception of Russia and a few other countries.

Those pushing for the New World Order are the same members of the elite class who control the U.S. government, otherwise referred to as the “shadow government.” Numerous politicians have publicly discussed the people who secretly control the U.S. political system, creating laws and bending them.

John F. Hylan, former Mayor of New York City, explained:

The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation . . .  The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties . . .  [and] control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government. It operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] seizes our executive officers, legislative bodies, schools, courts, newspapers and every agency created for the public

Senator Daniel K. Inouye, a high-ranking Asian-American politician, has also stated: “There exists a shadowy government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of the national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.” (source)

Canadian economist Dr. Michel Chossudovsky, who is the University of Ottawa’s Emeritus Professor of Economics, also gave a great speech at the International Conference on the New World Order. You can check that out and read more about it here. Who is this group of elites? Well, Dr. Chossudovsky believes it originates with those who control the U.S., Israel, and other allies, but who is controlling these countries and this massive global agenda?

The shadow government includes billionaire families like the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds, members of the financial elite like George Soros, and large corporations and big banks. The following video from THRIVE Movement, a documentary created by the heir to Proctor & Gamble, Foster Gamble, perfectly explains how this system works:

The shadow government can manipulate, or in some cases, create legislation through either close ties to politicians or even organizations like the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).

ALEC is a conservative group comprised of state legislators and corporate leaders that allows corporations to help write, or in some cases, just hand over legislation that the “official lawmakers” can then take credit for and formally propose. ALEC has been responsible for numerous immoral bills including those that aim to lower minimum wage, suppress voter rights, pro-gun laws, ag-gag (animal cruelty) bills, and more.

Political satirist John Oliver explains this in detail below:

It’s clear that corporations have a strong hold on government regulations; why else would chemicals be put in our food and the environment? Even the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has strong ties to oil companies, despite the fact that they’re supposedly the government agency that protects the environment (learn more here). Some have even speculated that the Trans-Pacific Partnership was designed to enable a one world economy.

Other countries are publicly recognizing the role the elite plays in the U.S. government. For example, after Bill Clinton accused Poland and Hungary of turning into a “Putin-like” and “authoritarian dictatorship” last year, their governments saw right through it.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán responded by saying, “The remarks made about Hungary and Poland … have a political dimension. These are not accidental slips of the tongue. And these slips or remarks have been multiplying since we are living in the era of the migrant crisis. And we all know that behind the leaders of the Democratic Party, we have to see George Soros.”

He went on to say that “the mouth is Clinton’s but the voice is of George Soros.”

In order to successfully create a New World Order, some of the tactics this group uses are false flag terrorism and the fear of global threats, which enable them to increase security measures on domestic populations (like Bill C-51) and thereby justify the invasion of other countries (like Iraq and 9/11, for example). You can read more about that in our CE article here.

David Rockefeller’s 1991 Speech at a Bilderberg Group Meeting

Although David Rockefeller just died, it’s inevitable that his family legacy will live on, quite possibly through the implementation of a one world government. As a most elite and a globalist, David was always a strong advocate of a one world government and was proud to support the New World Order.

The transcript from a 1991 Bilderberg group meeting in Baden, Germany, was released, proving how deluded Rockefeller’s views truly were. Bill Clinton also attended this meeting, I’m sure along with many other members of the elite class. Rockefeller stated:

We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward a world government. . . .  The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries. (source)

This quote is extremely revealing, as it proves that not only has he been striving to create a one world government since well before 1991, but mainstream media (MSM) news outlets were aware of it and chose not to disclose this information to the public. It’s disturbing that MSM turned a blind eye to this; however, it’s not really surprising given the fact that the elite people attending these types of meetings are the very people who fund and control these corporations.

MSM exercises extreme control over the masses, expertly keeping the general population ignorant and oblivious to the events going on all over the world. If you live in the U.S., you probably have no idea what’s going on with Syria or Russia, because the elite loves to keep you in the dark and feed you propaganda and misinformation (you can read more about that in our CE article here).

Despite his wrongdoings, Rockefeller was a proud member of the elite, and he voiced this pride on numerous occasions.

In 1994, Rockefeller was quoted at a U.N. dinner as saying, “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis, and the nations will accept the New World Order.”

Could this crisis have been 9/11, an orchestrated and planned demolition by the elite? Or perhaps he’s referring to the current events in Syria? Either way, it’s no secret that the elite use false flag terrorism to manipulate the masses.

David Rockefeller wrote in his 2002 memoirs: “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

Final Thoughts

It’s clear that the elite are pushing for a one world government, as it serves their best interests. They would gain further control of the population and make more money in the process. However, the elite has tried to spin this like it would be a good idea for the global society, which is far from reality.

Thankfully, there are other governments that see through their lies, highlighting the corruption that takes place within the U.S. government. The danger doesn’t lie within the idea of a one world government, but rather with the people who would control it.

CE strongly advocates for oneness and breaking down separatism and division, but that is not what this type of New World Order is about. The elite have been working against our best interests for a long time, which David Rockefeller plainly admitted in his 1991 Bilderberg speech.

The type of one world government that Rockefeller proposed would allow the elite to strengthen their leash on the general population and expand their reach. So far, they’ve proven that their goals are to strip us of our money and our rights, poison us through our food and the environment, and brainwash us using MSM and entertainment. Why would we want these people controlling the entire world?

It’s important to reflect on what role you, as a citizen, play in all of this. Are you supporting the organizations that the elite govern? Are you participating in and falling victim to the very systems that keep perpetuating their control over the system? While it may be difficult to admit, this is at least in part a reflection of you, because you are part of the collective; however, the good news is that you can be part of the solution. You vote with your voice and your dollar every single day — make it count!

Reprinted with permission from Collective Evolution.

|
Tags:, ,

Related Posts

  • Dr Studebaker

    All My Life I knew of its existence and we’ve been tipped off most recently by both Bushes NWO from they’re lips I’ve always asked the unanswered Question HOW MUCH IS ENOUGH !

  • DrArtaud

    The article is interesting, I enjoyed the video by or featuring Foster Gamble, and I didn’t know of ALEC. I found the video featuring John Oliver on ALEC to be biased. Clearly he’s liberal, reducing the abortion issue to mere choice, talking about gun control and the minimum wage as if more of both is desirable without understanding particulars on the issue. Though me and my wife watched it all, it was painful to do so.

    I searched YouTube for “American Legislative Exchange Council” and found other videos, but they, too, seem to have a liberal bent. I started to wonder, is there a liberal version? Of course, the answer is yes. Consulting one of the world’s most loathsome web sites, after a Google search, I found this:

    Article: SiX Could Be the Answer to ALEC

    Politico…..details the efforts in the liberal political donor camp to come up with something to combat the influence of the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council, or) ALEC. The new liberal counterpart…..State Innovation Exchange, or “SiX.”…..

    …..the basic idea is a good one: counterbalance the impressive inroads Republicans have made in state legislatures. ALEC has an excellent record of accomplishments, from getting laws passed…..

    From the Politico story:

    “SiX’s goal is an ambitious one: to compete with a well-financed network of conservative groups — including the American Legislative Exchange Council — that for years have dominated state policy battles, advancing pro-business, anti-regulation bills in state after state.

    SiX ultimately plans to raise as much as $10 million a year to boost progressive state lawmakers and their causes — partly by drafting model legislation in state capitols to increase environmental protections, expand voting rights, and raise the minimum wage — while also using bare-knuckle tactics like opposition research and video tracking to derail Republicans and their initiatives.

    “Progressives are looking around to figure out where to go to push back, and there has not been a vehicle to do that at the state level — it’s the biggest missing piece in the progressive infrastructure,” said Nick Rathod, a career Democratic operative who started and will run SiX.”

    Rathod is right. It’ll be interesting to see how successful he is in his attempts to build a liberal ALEC, but it’s hard not to wish him well in the effort. The idea has been tried a few times before in the last couple of years, but never with the level of funding Rathod hopes to get.

    But liberal activism has even a stronger, more global, alliances, namely the lamestream media, liberal universities, and environmental extremists in the govt. It’s not so much a wonder that ALEC exists under these circumstances. Having something passed into law in the age of open borders and political correctness would be insurmountable for most legislators on their own.

    I’m not saying ALEC is good, but perhaps it is necessary in dealing with politicians that have long since lost contact with the Constitution and the People. I’m far more concerned at the implications in the video excerpt by Foster Gamble.

    Article: Private Banks (Spurious Quotation). This web site, Monticello, is the analog to Snopes, you can consult here to find out Thomas Jefferson never really said those motivational things you thought he said, and for this reason, I have my doubts about the motivation of the site. But even taken as it is, it implies bankers are a problem and have been thought of such for years.

    Quotation: “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered…. I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies…. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”

    Status: This quotation is at least partly spurious; see comments below.

    Comments: This quotation is often cited as being in an 1802 letter to Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin, and/or “later published in The Debate Over the Recharter of the Bank Bill (1809).”

    The first part of the quotation (“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered”) has not been found anywhere in Thomas Jefferson’s writings, to Albert Gallatin or otherwise. It is identified in Respectfully Quoted as spurious, and the editor further points out that the words “inflation” and “deflation” are not documented until after Jefferson’s lifetime.

    The second part of the quotation (“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies“) may well be a paraphrase of a statement Jefferson made in a letter to John Taylor in 1816. He wrote, “And I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.”

    The third part of this quotation (“The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs”) may be a misquotation of Jefferson’s comment to John Wayles Eppes, “Bank-paper must be suppressed, and the circulating medium must be restored to the nation to whom it belongs.”