United CEO: ‘I deeply apologize’ to customer dragged off flight

The CEO of United Airlines has issued a stronger apology about a passenger who was dragged off a United Express flight, calling the Sunday afternoon confrontation “truly horrific.”

Oscar Munoz said in a statement issued Tuesday that he continues to be disturbed by the events that unfolded at Chicago O’Hare, adding that, “No one should ever be mistreated this way.”

Munoz was widely criticized for two statements Monday about the altercation, in which he described the 69-year-old man taken off the plane as “disruptive and belligerent.”

On Tuesday afternoon, however, the CEO changed his tune slightly, vowing to “fix what’s broken so this never happens again.”

The full statement, which was also posted on Twitter, reads:

The truly horrific event that occurred on this flight has elicited many responses from all of us: outrage, anger, disappointment. I share all of those sentiments, and one above all: my deepest apologies for what happened. Like you, I continue to be disturbed by what happened on this flight and I deeply apologize to the customer forcibly removed and to all the customers aboard. No one should ever be mistreated this way.  

I want you to know that we take full responsibility and we will work to make it right.  

It’s never too late to do the right thing. I have committed to our customers and our employees that we are going to fix what’s broken so this never happens again. This will include a thorough review of crew movement, our policies for incentivizing volunteers in these situations, how we handle oversold situations and an examination of how we partner with airport authorities and local law enforcement.

We’ll communicate the results of our review by April 30th

The statement was signed by Munoz. 


Meanwhile, The Associated Press reported the man dragged off the flight by airport police in Chicago is a Kentucky-based physician who was convicted more than a decade ago of felony charges involving his prescribing of drugs.

Still, there’s no indication his past influenced how he was treated or that the airline or police were aware of his background. And it’s unlikely that officials would have known anything about him other than basic identifying information such as his name and address, if that.

A person with knowledge of the Sunday evening flight who was not authorized to publicly release the information told The AP the passenger was David Dao, 69, of Elizabethtown, Ky.

According to a statement released Tuesday Dao is undergoing treatment in a Chicago hospital for his injuries.

“The family of Dr. Dao wants the world to know that they are very appreciative of the outpouring of prayers, concern and support they have received.  Currently, they are focused only on Dr. Dao’s medical care and treatment,” said Chicago attorney Stephen L. Golan of Golan Christie Taglia, who along with Chicago aviation attorney Thomas A. Demetrio of Corboy & Demetrio, represents the Dao family.  

While screaming can be heard on the videos, nowhere is Dao seen attacking the security officers. In fact, he appears relatively passive both when he was dragged down the aisle of the jet and when he is seen standing in the aisle later saying quietly, “I want to go home, I want to go home.”

|
  • AZ Cons

    This is such a non-story that I can’t believe the coverage it is getting. He is the one in trouble not United (in a lawful country). You don’t disregard lawful instructions by a flight crew or airport security, PERIOD!. I hope he gets 5 years and gets to pay United’s legal fees

  • DrArtaud

    In my humble opinion, by the time this individual is through with United, it would have been cheaper for United to by a new airplane, and train each of the effected crew members as a pilot, and let them fly to Louisville. The flight was not overbooked, so says the CEO now. United capriciously decided it needed the seats to send a crew for a flight the following day. Where they went wrong is seating him. To have denied the ability to board because of overbooking is one thing, Louisville is 300 miles away, they could have rented a car and let the crew drive together, they could have rented a chauffeur driven van and had them driven to Louisville, they could have sought seats on another carrier, or for that matter, arrange for them to be flown in a private plane.

    Heritage Foundation spoke against Conservative driven punishment for criminals, the 3 Strikes and You’re Out, because on the 3rd strike people will be tempted to kill witnesses since life in prison for a 3rd strike is the same as life imprison for homicide, and elimination of a witness reduces the likelihood of going to jail. Heritage also argued that the punishment should be commensurate with crime. The third strike for shoplifting should not give the same sentence as the 3rd strike for armed robbery. Likewise, United handled this individual, that did nothing more than purchase a ticket and be seated on the airplane according to company policy, as a terrorist. United should have continued to offer more $$ for the seats, or pursued other methods to transport their crew, treating a customer as a terrorist shows that United is not able to meet the challenges of operating a business in the modern world.

    There’s little doubt the passenger and perhaps ones traumatized by witnessing this event will win BIG in law suits, and the Stockholders and Investors will pay.

    United Airline Passenger Dragged Off from an Overbooked Flight - Jimmy Kimmel Monologue

    Everyone lost. Stock holders, crew, passengers (flight was delayed by 2 hours), and the victim.