Drain the Swamp: Trump Advisers Call For A ‘Purge’ Of Obama Appointees

Zero Hedge,

“His playbook should be to get rid of the Obama appointees immediately,”

Earlier this week, in an appearance on Fox News, Trump confirmed his beliefs that Obama is behind the litany of leaks that have plagued his administration over the past couple of months.

“No, I think he [Obama] is behind it, because his people are certainly behind it. I also think it is politics, that’s the way it is.”


And while the source of the leaks may be easy to deduce, the appropriate response is not so easy to implement.  That said, there is a growing chorus of advisers to the President who are urging him to purge the government of former Obama political appointees and quickly install more people who are loyal to him.

swampdeep_small Drain the Swamp: Trump Advisers Call For A ‘Purge’ Of Obama Appointees Headlines

Newt Gingrich is among those calling for such a purge…per Politico:

“His playbook should be to get rid of the Obama appointees immediately,” said Newt Gingrich, a top surrogate. “There are an amazing number of decisions that are being made by appointees that are totally opposed to Trump and everything he stands for. Who do you think those people are responding to?”
Gingrich added: “Ninety-five percent of the bureaucrats are against him.” 

Meanwhile, Gingrinch offered a backhanded compliment to Schumer, saying “I didn’t get it early on. This is not about slowing down the Cabinet. This is about keeping working control of the government for Obama.  It’s actually very shrewd on Schumer’s part.”

Gingrich said he blamed Sen. Chuck Schumer for slow-walking the nominees, though Schumer’s office notes that many of the picks were not properly vetted: At least three have already dropped out. The Office of Government Ethics remains overwhelmed with applications now, “but they are beginning to catch up,” one person involved in the nominations said. At many agencies, no top positions are filled, which means the layers of political appointees that report to them haven’t been picked, either.
“I didn’t get it early on. This is not about slowing down the Cabinet. This is about keeping working control of the government for Obama,” Gingrich said. “It’s actually very shrewd on Schumer’s part. Trump is not going to have control of the government until at least June.”

Roger Stone also chimed in on the debate saying the Trump administration should have cut ties with Obama’s staff “a long time ago, a long, long time ago.”

“If you employ people who aren’t loyal to you, you can’t be surprised when they leak,” said Roger Stone, another longtime adviser. A third person close to Trump said: “He should have gotten these people who are out to get him out a long time ago, a long, long time ago. I think they know that now.”
“You hire a bunch of people in the West Wing who are hacks and aren’t loyal to you, and you’ll have a bunch of leaks,” Stone said. “There aren’t that many Trump loyalists in the White House.”

Of course, in reality, Trump’s problems go much deeper than just the remaining Obama appointees as government agencies around Washington D.C. are staffed with 1,000s of career civil servants, many of whom loath President Trump’s administration and its agenda.

The reality, however, is more complicated: The White House has thousands of open jobs across the agencies, many nonpolitical civilian employees are critical of the administration, and some Cabinet secretaries say they need the Obama people during a rocky transition.
Only a few dozen Obama political appointees remain in the federal government apparatus, according to the Partnership for Public Service. Many of them are in crucial positions, including Robert Work, a top official at the Department of Defense, and Thomas Shannon, the acting deputy at the State Department.

Even if Trump were to ax those remaining senior political appointees, he would still have to reckon with the hundreds of thousands of civilian employees, who stay with every administration. Many of them are skeptical of Trump because they resent his assault on Washington and its culture, his impulsive decisions and his seeming lack of intellectual curiosity about their agencies and work.

The swamp seems to be much deeper than anyone could have predicted.

  • Dr Studebaker

    I said this before Newt Clinton did it to Bush after he got elected

  • DrArtaud

    I’d bring them all into a room. I’d tell them that:

    1. They have one week to implicate the guilty.
    2. Such implication can be:
    2A: Confession of one’s guilt.
    2B: Openly communicating with X in the Trump administration as to who the guilty party/s are.
    2C: Phoning 1-800-Rat-on-a-pig and remain anonymous as long as the tip is good.
    3. At the end of a week, if the guilty is not found, every obama era personnel in a relevant position will be fired subject to prosecution as warranted by subsequent facts.
    4. If the guilty person is identified, and the remainder permitted to keep their jobs, everyone deciding to remain will be given a lie detector test to see if:
    4A. They were involved in the leaks.
    4B. They knew of the leaks but didn’t pass the information on to the Trump administration.
    5. Anyone quitting rather than submit to the above will still be prosecuted as evidence and investigation reveals their guilt.