FLIGHT 370 Conspiracy: Hijacked? IBM Engineer Successfully Dialed out of Diego Garcia

Jim Stone Freelance

RUSH UPDATE: The story below is NOW CONFIRMED 100 PERCENT TRUE.

The blindfold: The man claimed to be blindfolded when he sent the message. When the American military blindfolds someone, it is accomplished by putting a bag over the head that is locked so you can’t get it off. This left the engineers hands free. This would have made it possible for him to pull his Iphone 5 (a fact confirmed by the Exif data) out of his butt as stated, and use the voice command ability of the Iphone to just talk to it to log in and post the message. This explains why he sent a black photo, he could not see what he was sending, he just knew he snapped a photo and sent whatever got taken.

The coordinates: When the coordinates are added to the fact that the photo’s exif data does not match the Google coordinates or any other coordinates for Diego Garcia that are posted online, but is still within the boundaries of Diego Garcia, it proves that no one just pulled those coordinates off the web. It helps confirm that this was not just a hoax because the coordinates are exact to wherever on Diego Garcia the Iphone was when it took the photo.

ORIGINAL POST FOLLOWS:

Map to diego Garcia-

Diego-Garcia

IBM ENGINEER TAKEN FROM HIJACKED FLIGHT 370 GOT A SELFIE OUT TO THE INTERNET.

This image, which appears black was posted as taken in a dark cell by an IBM engineer. The picture is black because the cell was too dark, but a critical piece of information was embedded in the Exif data, the coordinates to Diego Garcia, where the picture was taken. And it’s real, this is NOT a hoax. The coordinates in the picture indicate that the photo was taken within 3 miles of what Google officially gives for Diego Garcia. It is NOT EXACTLY what comes up on Google. It is off a couple miles, so NO ONE GOOGLED THIS, thus helping to confirm it’s authenticity. I don’t know how big the island is, but if it has a runway, that certainly fits.

The picture posted with the following text: “I have been held hostage by unknown military personal after my flight was hijacked (blindfolded). I work for IBM and I have managed to hide my cellphone in my ass during the hijack. I have been separated from the rest of the passengers and I am in a cell. My name is Philip Wood. I think I have been drugged as well and cannot think clearly.”

ASTEROID IMPACT LEVEL UPDATE: SCAMMERS ARE SAYING THERE NEVER WAS A PHILLIP WOOD WORKING FOR IBM. BUT HIS LINKDIN DESTROYS THAT LIE AND CONFIRMS THE STORY:

Image Exif data: THE SMOKING GUN

The Exif is intact. Exif data gets embedded in every image by every camera and includes the circumstances under which the photo was taken. It can be viewed by saving the image to your desktop, and then right clicking it and selecting image properties. Hit the details tab. You can see that the image was taken on March 18 with an Iphone 5, with the ISO at 3200 and a shutter of 1/15. The coordinates are included in the exif data because the Iphone knows where it is, and the coordinates are for Diego Garcia. THE FIRST TIME A BLANK PHOTO SAID IT ALL.

Exif can’t be rewritten with common software, it can only be added to in fields such as image credits with some advanced applications applications. It can be erased as well but NOT CHANGED. Photos with the exif intact will hold up in court. If the Exif is hacked and this is not real, the CIA or a really good hacker did this, which I doubt, I’d say it’s probably real.

Surrounding this story is the fact that the man who managed to get this information to Farganne (forum member Glitch) was harassed and received many threatening voice mails over it, that is another piece of evidence pointing to this as being real. One thing is certain, once it’s posted here on this site the genie is OUT OF THE BOTTLE. I cannot stress how important it is that the GPS coordinates in the photo do not perfectly match what Google says and are not posted anywhere on the web, because it proves that the source of those coordinates did not come from google or Wikipedia, they really did come from the imaging device and it HAD TO be at Diego Garcia when it took the photo.

DEAR U.S. ARMED FORCES: THE GAME IS OVER. RETURN FLIGHT 370 TO MALAYSIA AIRLINES, RETURN THE PEOPLE TO THEIR FAMILIES, AND SEND PHILLIP WOOD HOME. You have been BUSTED!!!

http://jimstonefreelance.com/phillipwood.html

Tagged with

FLIGHT IBM RETURN UPDATE WOOD

Jay

Is there any cellphone towers in Diego Garcia, and how was the message sent without signals….and every normal prisoners are strip searched by the police,ask this is a military level top secret program and how did he manage to keep the phone in his butt….
- Jazz
  
  I would not think that civilian personnel who are hijacked on a commercial flight would be thought of as individuals who would think to hide their cell phone in their butt. 99.9% positive, that most civilians would NOT think about stowing their cell phone there during a hijacking….
Smit

Erm, so it’s quite easy to change Exif data…http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8749560/how-can-i-tell-if-someone-modified-the-exif-data-in-a-photograph
Smit

Guessing this won’t be approved either… http://petapixel.com/2012/10/22/the-use-of-exif-data-in-digital-photos-as-courtroom-evidence/
Bryan

This has all the makings of a hoax. The classic “proof” with faulty logic to show that it isn’t a hoax is a dead giveaway.
1. They may blindfold people in this way, but that doesn’t mean that they wouldn’t search them (strip search + bend over and spread your cheeks). They would likely be handcuffed until they searched them.
2. An iphone5 is 2.31″ x 4.87″. You won’t get that up your ass without a large bottle of KY jelly and you wouldn’t be sitting or walking around at that point.
3. The fact that the GPS coordinates do not perfectly match the google coordinates does not prove anything, except that someone smart enough to create such a hoax would be smart enough to use google earth and move the pointer to pick other coordiinates in an effort to establish credibility. However, they weren’t smart enough to know that mentioning such efforts are a dead giveaway.
4. The fact that the photo is black doesn’t prove anything. Its black because even a blurry poorly lit image could be easily debunked. Does it make sense that they would blindfold them with this locking bag method, and tightly blindfold their eyes so that they couldn’t detect light or dark and put them in a room so dark that that you could develop film?
5. They don’t have cell phone service on Diego Garcia. They probably do have Internet on base, but I really doubt that any military facility has an open wifi access point.
6. You can edit EXIF data. And if you couldn’t, you could certainly have a milliary member stationed there take such a photo and then send it to a friend for circulation.
- LoneRanger
  
  i would disagree the above.. 1 , 2 because in such situation of survival i will push it up my ass either.
  3 you never know how accurate things can get at times so dont make judgements… 4 the photo can be taken in a dark room where they are all kept generally he dint care about the pic not like he was going to take a scenary but the actual fact is that his camera settings has got GPS on so when a pic is taken it will capture the gps location, think out of the box he is not expecting to “cheese and snap” but was sending a clue in the message which is the GPS coordinates… 5 his phone could be roaming enabled vice versa he is an ibm engineer which could be a network engineer to tweak crack password if there was wifi….
Alan

Oh! this is good, so convenient that the military passed him a SIM card for his butt iPhone just so he can send out a blacked out image. The author must think readers are just bloody naive fools who’ll believe very word here. LMAO! pun intended
Muad Mohamad Zaki

Conspiracies.. too many of them. Anyway, the map is incomplete because there are two countries around that area where the location is stated. 2014 and got an outdated map.. tsk tsk
Wong Chee Meng

If he had used voice command to create the message, he could have called someone. Who were the recipient(s) of his message? The pic was taken on 18/3/2014, 10 days after the hijack. That’s a long time to report the hijack and by you disclosing his name, would he not be in danger of being tortured or killed?